Find us @

Feature

A study suggests that sugar substitutes could cause diabetes

In a study, published by Talker, a group of scientists found that sugar substitutes could cause diabetes.

Published

on

via SWNS, Mark Waghorn

New research suggests that artificial sweeteners increase your risk of developing diabetes.

According to research, they have an impact on gut bacteria, which could change blood glucose levels.

Many people convert to them to satisfy their sweet taste without the added calories.

Numerous diet items, including cakes, pastries, ready meals, and fizzy beverages, contain sugar alternatives as well.

They contain aspartame and saccharin, which are also present in toothpaste and chewing gum.

Manufacturers have long maintained that their products have no impact on the body.

But now, experts have found that they are anything but inert.

In fact, some can transform the microbiomes of consumers in a way that affects blood sugar levels.

“In participants consuming the non-nutritive sweeteners, we could identify extremely distinct changes in the makeup and function of gut microorganisms, as well as the chemicals they secrete into the peripheral blood,” stated senior author Professor Eran Elinav of the German National Cancer Centre.

This appeared to indicate that human gut bacteria are somewhat susceptible to each of these sweeteners.”

Two non-nutritive sweeteners, saccharin and sucralose, significantly influenced glucose tolerance in healthy people when we examined non-nutritive sweetener consumers as a group.”

It’s interesting to notice that adjustments in people’s glycaemic responses were strongly associated with changes in the microorganisms.”

His team discovered the same phenomena in mice in 2014. They were looking to find if it also occurred in people.

After screening more than 1,300 individuals, Elinav and colleagues found 120 who carefully avoided artificial sweeteners in their daily lives.

The latter was divided into six groups: two controls and four who consumed much less aspartame, saccharin, stevia, or sucralose than the US Food and Drug Administration’s recommended daily amount (FDA).

Mice grown in totally sterile circumstances with no gut flora of their own and free of any germs were given injections of microbiological samples from the subjects.

Elinav remarked: “The outcomes were quite impressive. When we transferred the microbiome of the top responder individuals collected at a time point in which they were consuming the respective non-nutritive sweeteners into these sterile mice, the recipient mice developed glycemic alterations that very significantly mirrored those of the donor individuals in all of the non-nutritive sweetener groups but in none of the controls.” The microbiomes of the bottom responders, on the other hand, were largely unable to induce such glycaemic reactions.” These findings imply that, occasionally, glycaemic alterations in consumers may be brought on by the microbiota changes brought on by non-nutritive sugar usage.”

Because of the very distinctive makeup of our microbiota, he anticipates that the effects of the sweeteners will differ from person to person.

We need to spread the word about the fact that artificial sweeteners are not as harmless to humans as was once thought, said Elinav.

Having said that, it still merits more long-term research to determine the clinical health implications of any alterations they may cause in humans.

In the interim, we must keep looking for ways to satisfy our sweet desire while avoiding sugar, which is unquestionably the worst substance for our metabolic health. Personally, I think drinking only water is the best course of action.”

The results, which were published in the journal Cell, support earlier study that claimed sweets negatively affected metabolism and appetite regulation.

According to a study, sugar substitutes may increase the risk of developing diabetes.